Rahul Gandhi Parliament controversy unfolded on the floor of the Lok Sabha after the Leader of Opposition claimed he was stopped from speaking during the debate on the President’s Address.
Speaking to reporters outside Parliament, Rahul Gandhi claimed that Prime Minister Narendra Modi is under external pressure, using the word “compromised” to describe the situation. He said he intended to raise concerns related to international pressure points, including trade issues, tariff policies, and references to the Epstein files, but was stopped from continuing his remarks in the House.
Allegations of Being Silenced in Lok Sabha
Rahul Gandhi stated that it is a long-standing parliamentary convention for the Leader of Opposition to speak during key debates, and blocking his speech raises serious questions about democratic norms. According to him, objections were raised when he referred to sensitive global matters, after which his microphone was turned off and the session witnessed repeated disruptions.
Following the incident, Rahul Gandhi wrote a letter to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla, calling the episode a “blot on democracy” and alleging a deliberate attempt to silence the opposition. He maintained that his intention was to discuss matters of national importance within the framework of parliamentary rules.
Parliament Disruptions and MP Suspensions
The incident led to chaos inside Parliament, with protests by opposition members and the suspension of several MPs. The disruptions further escalated tensions during the session, which has already seen multiple confrontations between the government and opposition parties.
The ruling side defended the decision, citing parliamentary procedures and national security sensitivities, and said certain references made during the speech were not appropriate for discussion on the House floor.
Political Reactions Continue
Opposition leaders have backed Rahul Gandhi, arguing that the incident highlights concerns over freedom of speech and debate in Parliament. Meanwhile, government representatives have rejected the allegations, stating that rules were followed and that no member is above parliamentary discipline.The controversy continues to generate strong political reactions both inside and outside Parliament, with debates over democratic functioning expected to intensify in the coming days.